Why You Shouldn’t Use Public IPs in DHCP for Ordinary Networks
📰 Why You Shouldn’t Use Public IPs in DHCP for Ordinary Networks
🔍 Introduction
Many new network enthusiasts often ask:
“Can I configure my DHCP server to hand out public IP addresses?”
Technically, yes, it’s possible — but for an ordinary home or small business network, it’s not recommended and can even cause serious security and routing problems.
In this blog, we’ll explain why you shouldn’t use public IPs in DHCP on a normal network setup — and when it’s actually appropriate to do so.
🧩 What Are DHCP and Public IPs?
DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) – automatically assigns IP addresses to devices (e.g., laptops, phones, printers).
Public IPs – addresses visible on the global internet.
Private IPs – addresses used only inside your local network (e.g. 192.168.x.x, 10.x.x.x, 172.16–31.x.x).
In a typical setup, your DHCP server (usually your router) distributes private IPs, not public ones.
🚫 Why You Shouldn’t Assign Public IPs via DHCP on a Regular Network
1. 🔐 Security Risk – Exposed to the Internet
If your devices receive public IPs via DHCP, they’re directly exposed to the internet — with no NAT protection.
Even your printers, IP cameras, or NAS devices could be reachable from outside.
They can easily be scanned, attacked, or compromised.
It’s like having your front door open straight to the street — no gate, no wall.
2. ⚙️ NAT (Network Address Translation) Conflict
Most ISPs provide only one public IP per subscriber.
If you use that same public IP range in your DHCP pool, devices will conflict or fail to connect properly.
NAT solves this by allowing many private devices to share a single public IP.
If every device uses a public IP, NAT breaks — and most clients will lose internet access.
3. 🧱 Router and Firewall Rules Break
Routers are designed with a clear LAN (private) and WAN (public) separation.
If you assign public IPs inside your LAN, many built-in rules (firewall, NAT, DNS redirection) won’t work properly.
Examples:
Port forwarding fails or behaves unpredictably.
Captive portal and hotspot features break.
Internal DNS resolution stops functioning correctly.
🧠 A Personal Observation
During a recent hotel stay, I noticed something unusual — my laptop obtained a public IP address directly from their DHCP server. Out of curiosity, I checked the configuration and found that the network still had NAT and a firewall in place.
While it technically worked, this setup raised a red flag:
it exposed every guest device on a publicly routable subnet, relying entirely on the firewall for isolation.
One misconfiguration could have exposed all guest traffic to the internet — or to each other.
That experience reminded me why public DHCP is rarely a good idea outside of ISP or data center environments.
4. 💸 Public IPs Are Expensive and Limited
Public IP addresses are scarce and costly.
In most networks, it’s unnecessary to assign public IPs to every device.
It’s more efficient to use private IPs with NAT, and only assign public IPs to servers that must be reachable from the internet (via 1:1 NAT or static mapping).
💡 When It’s Acceptable to Use Public IPs with DHCP
There are specific, valid scenarios:
ISPs that assign public IPs to customer modems or routers.
Data centers where each server needs direct internet access.
Enterprise networks that own a dedicated public subnet and have advanced firewalls.
If you don’t own your own public subnet, stick with private IPs.
🧰 Recommended Setup for Typical Networks
| Component | Recommended |
|---|---|
| LAN IP Range | 192.168.1.0/24 (Private) |
| DHCP Range | 192.168.1.100–192.168.1.200 |
| NAT | Enabled (Masquerade) |
| WAN | Public IP (from ISP) |
| Optional Server | Use 1:1 NAT or port forwarding for public access |
This setup is safe, efficient, and follows global best practice for home and small business networks.
📘 Standards & Why They Matter
According to RFC 1918, private address space exists specifically for internal networks. Using public IPs in DHCP violates this standard because those addresses are meant for globally routed use, not local allocation.
NAT standards, including RFC 2663 and RFC 3022, explain how internal private IPs can be translated to public ones for internet connectivity.
Using public IPs inside your LAN bypasses this translation model and causes conflicts and exposure.
Furthermore, RFC 7969 mentions that DHCP configurations should respect network topology — meaning your DHCP pool should align with the correct network scope (private LAN vs. public WAN).
🔚 Conclusion
Using public IPs in DHCP is like placing the internet inside your home — with no security gate in between.
For ordinary networks, private IPs with NAT remain the safest, most stable, and most manageable approach.
If you ever receive a public IP block, use it properly through correct routing and firewall setup, not by simply assigning it via DHCP.
Comments
Post a Comment